Is it now....we lost steel, automobiles, and a lot of other products to overseas producers largely because we didn't know what quality was and our competitors did. I don't think that's too funny.
We lost most of these things due to one thing only PRICE
You are now hearing from someone who has seen many jobs personally lost because of outsourcing to the cheapest competitor
For almost 30 years, I have been in the aircraft industry all the way from a machine operator, machinist (there is a difference) to an CERTIFIED ASME LEVEL I, II, And III layout inspector with radiographics as well. I worked my way up the ladder and into design work, getting two degrees on the way.
My last job was to create the two systems to allow the F35 aircraft to fly in the vertical mode. and they both do so flawlessly!
Quality is not JUST about meeting specs, but is about exceeding them without undue stress on other factors, such as cost. One and only one portion of quality has to due with MEETING specs. There is also appearance.
From YOUR definition earlier, if it functions, and only functions, then it is quality. This is bunk.
If I were a betting man, Smitty, I would wager you worked in one of three industries, or better yet places.
Ma Bell/ATT, General Motors or some other american car company, or IBM.
This is the philosophy that these companies tried to keep slaming down our throats, and yet in the end, during the 70's and 8-0's it came back to bite them BIG TIME. They did not want to listen to the consumer, and so it opened up the market for the cheaper, and sometimes less quality items to come into the market.
If you worked for one of the three areas above, then your last statement I quoted is true. If you did not, then the chances you lost to competitors is price.
If you want to further discuss this in a one on one forum, please pm me and I will gladly send you my number, but so far, most of what has been inundated about quality here is really BUMK
Sincerely
Jerry Sambrook