Would any part of the mid-section of that thing even make a decent blank? I mean the pattern area and scales in the mid section are sooo big... Would it even look identifiable around something as skinny as a pen if a piece was taken from right in the middle?
:biggrin::biggrin::good:Agreed!Hot dang - bet you could turn the fangs on that one
Would any part of the mid-section of that thing even make a decent blank? I mean the pattern area and scales in the mid section are sooo big... Would it even look identifiable around something as skinny as a pen if a piece was taken from right in the middle?
No not really, some of the 5' long diamondbacks that i've gotten are around 8" wide once I skin them. so usually the only areas that are of use will be up near the neck and the "coon" tail (black and white). In the case of a snake this big, just having a blank from it would be cool just knowing how big it was
That pic is an optical illusion......no rattlesnake is that large. Google it and you will see it's an illusion from holding the snake so close to the camera. It appears larger than it is.
I haven't done much casting, and haven't messed around with skin blanks of any form... But I am always left wondering when I see talk (serious or not) of making blanks out of a big ol' monster like that... Would any part of the mid-section of that thing even make a decent blank? I mean the pattern area and scales in the mid section are sooo big... Would it even look identifiable around something as skinny as a pen if a piece was taken from right in the middle?
That pic is an optical illusion......no rattlesnake is that large. Google it and you will see it's an illusion from holding the snake so close to the camera. It appears larger than it is.
Here is a link to a article about the snake in the picture. GON.com - Screven County Diamondback Measures 6 1/2 Feet - Georgia Outdoor NewsThat pic is an optical illusion......no rattlesnake is that large. Google it and you will see it's an illusion from holding the snake so close to the camera. It appears larger than it is.
Steve; The Eastern Diamond back Rattle Snake is the largest member of the pit viper family found in North America. They can run in excess of 8 feet and weigh over 10#s with the ability of striking 1/3 of it's length. A snake this size would easily have enough venom to kill several people. The bites of smaller ones may not kill you, but they are very painful and disabeling. Guessing the man in the photo is 6 feet tall, and using triangulation and trigonometic principles, this snake is easly close to 8 feet long if not longer. I could be more accurate if I knew how tall the man was. Ask anyone along the South Eastern coast line how big the snakes get in the swamps and the Everglades. I have watched the Gater Boys take rattlers well over 6 feet on their show from FLA. Jim S
Here is a link to a article about the snake in the picture. GON.com - Screven County Diamondback Measures 6 1/2 Feet - Georgia Outdoor NewsThat pic is an optical illusion......no rattlesnake is that large. Google it and you will see it's an illusion from holding the snake so close to the camera. It appears larger than it is.
Steve; The Eastern Diamond back Rattle Snake is the largest member of the pit viper family found in North America. They can run in excess of 8 feet and weigh over 10#s with the ability of striking 1/3 of it's length. A snake this size would easily have enough venom to kill several people. The bites of smaller ones may not kill you, but they are very painful and disabeling. Guessing the man in the photo is 6 feet tall, and using triangulation and trigonometic principles, this snake is easly close to 8 feet long if not longer. I could be more accurate if I knew how tall the man was. Ask anyone along the South Eastern coast line how big the snakes get in the swamps and the Everglades. I have watched the Gater Boys take rattlers well over 6 feet on their show from FLA. Jim S
The person in the photo admits its only about 6'6" long.