Billman
Member
I buy I few blanks now and then off of eBay when I see something that has no action and is going to sell for mega cheap, or stuff I can't find here.
I am having a issue with a seller, and I need your advice.
I won a auction for some Irish Bog Oak, and received the item(s). In the ad they state that "THEY ARE ALL 5 1/4" LONG & VARY FROM 3/4" TO 7/8". When I received the blanks, most of them are significantly thinner than 3/4... Most have a thickness of 5/8. All of them are 3/4 to 7/8 wide, however. Here is the ad listing so you can check it out for yourself instead of taking my word for it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&item=160341892623
The seller has reluctantly agreed to refund the auction price, but refuses to pay for the original shipping charge. This is where I have the issue... I feel since I did not mis-read the ad, and it is their fault for not listing them properly, I should not have to pay for the original shipping charge. (On a side note, this seller has gotten increasingly whacky in her e-mail responses to me claiming 1) That they said they were 5/8 in the listing. 2) They used the phrase "vary" in her ad and feels that is enough to cover her mistake. 3) Claimed to have talked to eBay live and said they "agreed" with her. And 4) keep trying tell me about the background of the wood... 1500 years old, her grandfather bought it, yada yada yada.
Am I wrong for wanting my original shipping charge back for a item that wasn't listed properly and is basically unusable for what I had planned? Hell, if it would have said 5/8 ANYWHERE in the listing, I wouldn't have bid on them at all.
Lets hear it, am I the goofball or are they?
I am having a issue with a seller, and I need your advice.
I won a auction for some Irish Bog Oak, and received the item(s). In the ad they state that "THEY ARE ALL 5 1/4" LONG & VARY FROM 3/4" TO 7/8". When I received the blanks, most of them are significantly thinner than 3/4... Most have a thickness of 5/8. All of them are 3/4 to 7/8 wide, however. Here is the ad listing so you can check it out for yourself instead of taking my word for it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&item=160341892623
The seller has reluctantly agreed to refund the auction price, but refuses to pay for the original shipping charge. This is where I have the issue... I feel since I did not mis-read the ad, and it is their fault for not listing them properly, I should not have to pay for the original shipping charge. (On a side note, this seller has gotten increasingly whacky in her e-mail responses to me claiming 1) That they said they were 5/8 in the listing. 2) They used the phrase "vary" in her ad and feels that is enough to cover her mistake. 3) Claimed to have talked to eBay live and said they "agreed" with her. And 4) keep trying tell me about the background of the wood... 1500 years old, her grandfather bought it, yada yada yada.
Am I wrong for wanting my original shipping charge back for a item that wasn't listed properly and is basically unusable for what I had planned? Hell, if it would have said 5/8 ANYWHERE in the listing, I wouldn't have bid on them at all.
Lets hear it, am I the goofball or are they?
Last edited: