Randy_
Member
Hey, this is great.....a resupply for the magazine rack in my "library!!!" [}]
As to determining a winner, no point in making this more complicated than necessary. I propose we each rate the submissions and send those ratings to Mark:
3 for first
2 for second and
1 for third
Mark can compile the ratings and announce a winner.
And just a suggestion for the future. It might be better if the submissions are judged anonymously with judges receiving the entries identified with a number rarher than the real author.
But I am also wondering.....what if these guys lied about their identity.....how will we know who the real winner is??
As to determining a winner, no point in making this more complicated than necessary. I propose we each rate the submissions and send those ratings to Mark:
3 for first
2 for second and
1 for third
Mark can compile the ratings and announce a winner.
And just a suggestion for the future. It might be better if the submissions are judged anonymously with judges receiving the entries identified with a number rarher than the real author.
But I am also wondering.....what if these guys lied about their identity.....how will we know who the real winner is??